Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
SAYNOTO0870.COM

<---- Back to main website

 
Home Help Search Login Register

Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
Tax payers foot £32,000 sign bill (Read 41,516 times)
bbb_uk
Global Moderator
*****
Offline



Posts: 2,041
Re: Tax payers foot £32,000 sign bill
Reply #15 - Aug 13th, 2007 at 4:37pm
 
Dave wrote on Aug 13th, 2007 at 4:24pm:
So, either Ms Hagan is lying, or Traveline and its "board" has not negotiated as good a deal as it might have done with its telco.
A little bit of both I suspect.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
bbb_uk
Global Moderator
*****
Offline



Posts: 2,041
Re: Tax payers foot £32,000 sign bill
Reply #16 - Aug 13th, 2007 at 4:58pm
 
It looks like Travelline use BT as their supplier.

Looking here BT pay just over 2p/min in revenue for calls received on one of their 0871.  That means BT keep around 7/8ppm.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
derrick
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1,124
Re: Tax payers foot £32,000 sign bill
Reply #17 - Aug 14th, 2007 at 12:25pm
 
derrick wrote on Aug 13th, 2007 at 2:52pm:
jgxenite wrote on Aug 13th, 2007 at 2:45pm:
Be interesting to see how they weasel their way out of that one Smiley. I suspect the old "one national number for all" excuse will be used...


Well I know that they have opened the e-mail I sent earlier, at 12-12 p. m., they opened it 5 minutes later



Still no reply from Traveline  Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
jgxenite
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


Help us to help you -
read the instructions!!

Posts: 1,454
Gender: male
Re: Tax payers foot £32,000 sign bill
Reply #18 - Aug 14th, 2007 at 12:28pm
 
My suspicion would be that head office has probably told them not to bother answering questions above and beyond the "bog standard crud" they sent you in the first email. They know they can't justify why they are using such an expensive number, and why a normal geographic would not be sufficient for their purposes.
Back to top
 

I don't mind helping you with your request as long as you read the instructions!
 
IP Logged
 
derrick
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1,124
Re: Tax payers foot £32,000 sign bill
Reply #19 - Aug 14th, 2007 at 4:02pm
 
On Friday 10th August I e-mailed the councillor mentioned in the LEP article with the question " why is taxpayers money being used" he had opened it on the 11th August but as of today had not bothered to reply to me, so I e-mailed him again with the following:-

I would like to know why you have not had the common decency to respond to my e-mail,( copy attached), sent to you on the 10th August 2007 and opened by you on 11th August,( my e-mails are tagged, and I know when they are opened by the recipient).

Also what is the meaning of your title "cabinet member for sustainable development"? as you do not seem to be sustaining taxpayers money by flagrantly throwing it around like confetti to a private company,(Traveline), so that they can boost their profits by means of a covert premium rate phone number,(0871)?

If you do not respond to me, as one of your paymasters, then I will obtain the answer via the Freedom of Information Act, citing your refusal to cooperate as the reason behind the FOI request.    


He replied with this after 1 hour:-

Dear Mr ******, if you would be pleased to turn it round in what you call your mind, you will find you have asked a few detailed and complicated questions. If you have not the curtsey to wait for an answer perhaps you would like to move straight on to the Ombudsman. She has offices in York, I can get you the address if you would like. Having now formally responded I have put your letter to the very bottom of my in tray. FIA that!

Yours etc,

Tony Martin





   I have already replied to him in the same arrogant manner, and will now request the info via FOI.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Dave
Global Moderator
*****
Offline



Posts: 9,902
Yorkshire
Gender: male
Re: Tax payers foot £32,000 sign bill
Reply #20 - Aug 14th, 2007 at 4:20pm
 
derrick wrote on Aug 14th, 2007 at 4:02pm:
I have already replied to him in the same arrogant manner, and will now request the info via FOI.

Derrick, I have to say that I feel that you should have given him time to respond (a week or two) and that your email which started off "I would like to know why you have not had the common decency to respond to my e-mail..." is really rude and aggressive in itself.

The basis for investigating the new Traveline number is a good one and one I hope that newspapers will be interested in. I also hope you will bring up other points raised on here like why they opted for a maximum priced 0871 number and not one charged same as or similar to 0870 and whether they get more revenue from 0871. If they don't, then clearly they have not got as good a deal as they should have done if we accept the 0871 number.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Aug 14th, 2007 at 4:21pm by Dave »  
 
IP Logged
 
derrick
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1,124
Re: Tax payers foot £32,000 sign bill
Reply #21 - Aug 16th, 2007 at 10:44am
 
E-mail received from councillor Tony Martin:-

Dear Mr ******, I have now collated the information I needed to get you a full, informed and reasoned answer. It won't suit your prejudice, but then the facts rarely do. This will be the last email I send to you. Another fact you won't like. Councillors in this country do not get a salary as you claim; we get a basic allowance, responsibility allowances and expenses for costs incurred. To business:

Traveline in Lancashire

Traveline in Lancashire is managed by PTi Limited, a company limited by guarantee. It is a partnership company funded by Lancashire County Council, Blackpool Council and Blackburn with Darwen Council and all commercial bus operators in the County with Directors appointed from local authorities and bus companies. It is a "not for profit" company and is part of a network of Traveline call centres throughout the UK.

Traveline was established in 2000 following a requirement from the Department for Transport (DfT) to create a national network of Traveline call centres using a single telephone number platform (0870). The 0870 608 2 608 number, originally used in Lancashire for transport enquiries, was chosen as it was a national number that was able to be routed geographically to the nearest Traveline call centre and was also able to create a small national income stream that would pay for the use of the number and generate a rebate to pay for the national management of Traveline along with small rebates to the regions throughout the UK and for future developments, like a national SMS service and website.

In 2006 OFCOM changed the way 0870 numbers could be used. It would have been possible to stay on the 0870 telephone platform but this would no longer generate income and nationally Traveline would have to pay to receive calls. Therefore authorities, like Lancashire, would require an ongoing revenue stream to fund the service. It was also a continuing desire from the DfT that the UK should retain a single number for public transport enquiries. The national Traveline Board, after consultation with the regions, opted for a new number 0871 200 22 33 whereby calls from a landline cost 10p per minute. This option was chosen as it would allow for an income to pay for the ongoing national management of the service along with future developments and future rebates to the regions when income through usage has increased. Appropriate reference is made to this cost on publicity material and has been agreed by the regulating bodies and Traveline nationally.

The Lancashire Evening Post article stated "The signs will give the revised Traveline number which OFCOM changed from the premium rate 0870 to a national rate 0871 200 22 33 number". The cabinet report submitted actually says "changes to the national Traveline phone numbers following an Office of Communications decision in January 2006 to revise all 0870 numbers". There is no mention in the cabinet report of either "premium" or "national rate" therefore the confusion appears to have arisen from the wording of the Evening Post article.

In Lancashire, LCC are responsible for the maintenance and replacement of all public transport information including bus stop plates. As all plates in Lancashire, approximately 8000, have the Traveline phone number on they need to be updated with the new number, which has already come into effect, but is running in parallel with the current 0870 number until January 2008. As part of a national requirement to promote this single number, LCC along with most other local authorities in the UK have to make arrangements to update all their infrastructure. External, commercial, organisations like Stagecoach, First Bus and Arriva also have to update their information and bus liveries.

Whilst Lancashire County Council explores all opportunities to use its budgets as efficiently as practical, it is difficult to accommodate additional expenditure resulting from costs outside its direct control. The recent changes in the Traveline telephone number and Government legislation/County Council policies on prohibition of smoking in bus shelters, which has required additional signage, it is necessary to apply for additional capital funding to assist in this task.

The change in the telephone number is out of the Local Authorities direct control, Traveline is part of a national public transport enquiry service and provides a valuable service to the people of Lancashire.

Yours etc,

Tony Martin


You can see the arrogance of the man re this quote from the e-mail:-  "This will be the last email I send to you."
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
jgxenite
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


Help us to help you -
read the instructions!!

Posts: 1,454
Gender: male
Re: Tax payers foot £32,000 sign bill
Reply #22 - Aug 16th, 2007 at 11:14am
 
It still continues to bemuse me why LCC (or Traveline for that matter) cannot also provide the number for local Traveline centres. I suspect the wording that relates to them "receiving profit" from their calls explains the fact as to why they have the most expensive 0871 number, and are unwilling to publicise such numbers. Tony got it wrong, mind, saying that it would cost 10p from a landline as that is only a requirement if you happen to be on some silly BT tariff - that rate may be lower or higher on other landline services, and we already know that it costs a premium if you call it from a mobile phone!
Back to top
 

I don't mind helping you with your request as long as you read the instructions!
 
IP Logged
 
derrick
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1,124
Re: Tax payers foot £32,000 sign bill
Reply #23 - Sep 19th, 2007 at 3:31pm
 
Received today from Lancashire County Council, most, if not all is posted above,#21, but there is a bit extra, plus the link.

Dear Mr. ,

Further to your request made under the Freedom of Information Act, we are now in a position to respond. Each point raised in your email is addressed in turn below; and we will respond to your enquiry regarding the use of 0845 by way of a separate email to avoid confusion.

1)     Why is taxpayers' money being given to a private company so that they can change the phone number on their signs so that they, (covertly), increase their revenue from Traveline's phone number?

In order to answer this part of your enquiry, we have prepared the following explanation regarding the Traveline service and the manner in which it operates.

Traveline in Lancashire is managed by PTi Limited, a company limited by guarantee. It is a partnership company funded by Lancashire County Council, Blackpool Council and Blackburn with Darwen Council and all commercial bus operators in the County with Directors appointed from local authorities and bus companies. It is a "not for profit" company and is part of a network of Traveline call centres throughout the UK.

Traveline was established in 2000 following a requirement from the Department for Transport (DfT) to create a national network of Traveline call centres using a single telephone number platform (0870). The 0870 608 2 608 number, originally used in Lancashire for transport enquiries, was chosen as it was a national number that was able to be routed geographically to the nearest Traveline call centre and was also able to create a small national income stream that would pay for the use of the number and generate a rebate to pay for the national management of Traveline along with small rebates to the regions throughout the UK and for future developments, for example a national SMS service and website.

In 2006 OFCOM changed the way 0870 numbers could be used. It would have been possible to stay on the 0870 telephone platform but this would no longer generate income and nationally Traveline would have to pay to receive calls. Therefore authorities, like Lancashire, would require an extra ongoing revenue stream to fund the service. It was also a continuing desire from the DfT that the UK should retain a single number for public transport enquiries. It was the decision of the national Traveline Board, after consultation with the regions, to opt for a new number 0871 200 22 33 whereby calls from a landline cost 10p per minute. This option was chosen as it would allow for an income to pay for the ongoing national management of the service along with future developments and future rebates to the regions when income through usage has increased. Appropriate reference is made to this cost on publicity material and has been agreed by the regulating bodies and Traveline nationally.

The Lancashire Evening Post article stated "The signs will give the revised Traveline number which OFCOM changed from the premium rate 0870 to a national rate 0871 200 22 33 number". The cabinet report submitted actually says "changes to the national Traveline phone numbers following an Office of Communications decision in January 2007 to revise all 0870 numbers". There is no mention in the cabinet report of either "premium" or "national rate" therefore the confusion appears to have arisen from the wording of the Evening Post article.

In Lancashire, the County Council is responsible for the maintenance and replacement of all public transport information including bus stop plates. As all plates in Lancashire, approximately 8000, have the Traveline phone number on, they need to be updated with the new number, which has already come into effect, but is running in parallel with the current 0870 number until January 2008. As part of a national requirement to promote this single number, Lancashire County Council along with most other local authorities in the UK have to make arrangements to update their entire infrastructure. External commercial organisations like Stagecoach, First Bus and Arriva also have to update their information and bus liveries.

Whilst Lancashire County Council explores all opportunities to use its budgets as efficiently as practical, it is difficult to accommodate additional expenditure resulting from costs outside its direct control. The recent changes in the Traveline telephone number and Government legislation/County Council policies on prohibition of smoking in bus shelters, which has required additional signage, it is necessary to apply for additional capital funding to assist in this task.

The change in the telephone number is out of the Local Authority's direct control. Traveline is part of a national public transport enquiry service and provides a valuable service to the people of Lancashire.


The rest follows in the next post.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
derrick
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1,124
Re: Tax payers foot £32,000 sign bill
Reply #24 - Sep 19th, 2007 at 3:32pm
 
Follow on post, 

2)     I require all the minutes from the meetings relating to this abuse of taxpayers money and Tony Martin's role in the matter.

As indicated in our response to your first question, the decision was taken at national level by the Traveline Board, not by Lancashire County Council. As such, County Councilllor Tony Martin was not involved in the decision to change the number; and no minutes relating to his role in this matter therefore exist. His role was as the appropriate Cabinet Member whose approval was sought for the capital expenditure relating to the new Traveline information branding on bus stops and other public transport signage throughout Lancashire. The report submitted by the Executive Director of Environment relating to this matter is attached herewith. This is also accessible on the Lancashire County Council website at the following URL:

http://www3.lancashire.gov.uk/council/meetings/displayFile.asp?FTYPE=D&FILEID=16...

We trust that your find this informative, but if you are not satisfied with this response for any reason, please write to The Freedom of Information Officer, Lancashire County Council, PO Box 78, County Hall, Preston, PR1 8XJ or email freedomofinformation@lancashire.gov.uk

Following this, should you remain dissatisfied, you then have the right to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner, whose contact details are as follows:

Information Commissioner's Office

Wycliffe House

Water Lane

Wilmslow

Cheshire

SK9 5AF

01625 545 745

Email: mail@ico.gsi.gov.uk

http://www.informationcommissioner.gov.uk/

Yours sincerely,

Freedom of Information

Lancashire County Council

PO Box 78

County Hall

Preston

PR1 8XJ



Tel: (01772) 531115

Fax: (01772) 530949

email: freedomofinformation@lancashire.gov.uk


The part highlighted relates to the attachment they sent which is the url link!



Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
bbb_uk
Global Moderator
*****
Offline



Posts: 2,041
Re: Tax payers foot £32,000 sign bill
Reply #25 - Sep 19th, 2007 at 5:27pm
 
With the exception of Traveline moving suppliers for their telephone number then it would appear that for them (traveline) to continue to gain revenue stealthly (the very common method used these days  Angry ) then they really had no choice except move to an 0871.

BT here provide some information for their customers using 0870 and in the links provided it becomes apparent that to continue using an 0870 will cost Traveline (in this case) an extra 5p/min (approx) for incoming calls on an 0870 once revenue sharing is prohibited.

BT don't appear to offer revenue share on 0844 * (even at 5p/min) so that would mean the only course of action to keep receiving revenue without us consumers knowing about it is to migrate to an 0871.

It kindof leaves the question, how BT can stay in business with regards to their 08x numbers when most (if not all) other suppliers of these numbers can offer things more cheaply and with more revenue?

Maybe if this was the case then Traveline may have opted for an 0844 number although not ideal it would still be 50% cheaper than their current number!



* Revenue share maybe possible for really high users of 0844 like large businesses with call centres, etc.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Sep 19th, 2007 at 5:34pm by bbb_uk »  
 
IP Logged
 
kk
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 354
Gender: male
Re: Tax payers foot £32,000 sign bill
Reply #26 - Sep 19th, 2007 at 6:54pm
 
Hi bbb_uk,
You said that:

“Maybe if this was the case then Traveline may have opted for an 0844 number although not ideal it would still be 50% cheaper than their current number!”

But 0844 can cost more than 0870 outside the day rate. Also, 0844 cost more than 0870 from a pay phone, at all times.
Back to top
 

KK
 
IP Logged
 
bbb_uk
Global Moderator
*****
Offline



Posts: 2,041
Re: Tax payers foot £32,000 sign bill
Reply #27 - Sep 19th, 2007 at 8:12pm
 
kk wrote on Sep 19th, 2007 at 6:54pm:
But 0844 can cost more than 0870 outside the day rate.
I said in comparison to their current number which is an 0871 costing 10p/min from a landline.

However, from a mobile then either both 0844 and 0871 are same price or 0871 is more expensive i'm not sure.  As for payphones I really have no idea how much it costs for any numbers these days!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
NGMsGhost
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


The Forum Ghost of NonGeographicalMan<b
r />

Posts: 2,720
Surrey, United Kingdom
Gender: male
Re: Tax payers foot £32,000 sign bill
Reply #28 - Sep 19th, 2007 at 10:17pm
 
bbb_uk wrote on Sep 19th, 2007 at 5:27pm:
With the exception of Traveline moving suppliers for their telephone number then it would appear that for them (traveline) to continue to gain revenue stealthly (the very common method used these days  Angry ) then they really had no choice except move to an 0871.

BT don't appear to offer revenue share on 0844 * (even at 5p/min) so that would mean the only course of action to keep receiving revenue without us consumers knowing about it is to migrate to an 0871.


So why didn't Traveline end their ripoff deal with BT and move to a supplier that gave them a better deal at least allowing them to use 0844 as a replacement for 0870, while still earning the same revenue share.

Quote:
It kindof leaves the question, how BT can stay in business with regards to their 08x numbers when most (if not all) other suppliers of these numbers can offer things more cheaply and with more revenue?


Because of people like my Brother in Law an ultra conservative (with a small c) school teacher who is worred anyone other than a huge corporate name like BT may not be reliable.

Of course most of us will say BT is thoroughly complacent and also delivers the worst service of the lot but you try telling my brother in law that.

The thought of a local authority paying to change all the numbers to ICSTIS controlled premium rate is enough to make you want to vomit.  I don't how they square this with their duties under the COI's government contact centre guidance policies.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Sep 19th, 2007 at 10:19pm by NGMsGhost »  

<div style=
 
IP Logged
 
jgxenite
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


Help us to help you -
read the instructions!!

Posts: 1,454
Gender: male
Re: Tax payers foot £32,000 sign bill
Reply #29 - Sep 19th, 2007 at 10:38pm
 
derrick wrote on Sep 19th, 2007 at 3:31pm:
Traveline was established in 2000 following a requirement from the Department for Transport (DfT) to create a national network of Traveline call centres using a single telephone number platform (0870). The 0870 608 2 608 number, originally used in Lancashire for transport enquiries, was chosen as it was a national number that was able to be routed geographically to the nearest Traveline call centre and was also able to create a small national income stream that would pay for the use of the number and generate a rebate to pay for the national management of Traveline along with small rebates to the regions throughout the UK and for future developments, for example a national SMS service and website.


If it was a requirement, why do PTEs like Travel South Yorkshire and Metro, along with Transport for London (not sure if this is a PTE) use normal geographic numbers? Is it possible that they realise that using a non-geographic number is a total rip-off for their customers and so prefer to use a normal geographic number which people know will cost a certain amount of money for them (even be free in some cases).
Back to top
 

I don't mind helping you with your request as long as you read the instructions!
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
(Moderators: Dave, Forum Admin, CJT-80, DaveM, bbb_uk)

Website and Content © 1999-2024 SAYNOTO0870.COM. All Rights Reserved. (DE)
Written permission is required to duplicate any of the content within this site.

WARNING: This is an open forum, posts are NOT endorsed by SAYNOTO0870.COM,
please exercise due caution when acting on any info from here.


SAYNOTO0870.COM » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2025. All Rights Reserved.


Valid RSS Valid XHTML Valid CSS Powered by Perl Source Forge