No.

See Geographical (01/02) Vs 0845/0870 price comparison.

Some people do pay more to call geographical numbers than 0845 ones at certain times. These are on the most basic tariffs.

The point is that there is a free market in tariffs and these variation in prices don't apply to 0845 numbers (apart from provider to provider). Local and national calls cost the same anyway.

There may be a benefit in operating both 0845 and a geographical number, though. If there is already an underlying number, you can simply publish that alongside the 0845 number and let people choose which to call.

Without wishing to complicate the situation by adding a further dose of advice, I would understand the situation to be as follows.

At one time there were advantages to some distant callers in having a 0845 (local rate) number. Now that there is no longer any distinction between local and national calls, these have disappeared.

"Non-geographic" numbers can offer ready access to certain technical features. When a 084, or 087x number is used the cost of these features can be subsidised by the "revenue share" obtained from callers. Because revenue sharing is prohibited with 03xx numbers, the cost of these has to be carried in full, making 03xx numbers more expensive.

If the callers in question are beneficiaries of a "charitable" service, it is unlikely that one would wish them to subsidise the cost of providing it. There are however some charities that operate in this way using 084x or 087x numbers, effectively levying a small charge on users of their services.

Perverse discounting by some telephone service providers means that some can call 0845 numbers at a slightly lesser rate than that which applies to geographic or 03xx numbers. We do not however have any assurance about how long this odd situation will remain in force. The additional cost of renting two numbers and providing different types of service, may not make this a sensible option.

If the benefits of the features available with a non-geographic number are required, it would probably have to be a 03xx number. If there is no reason not to have a geographic number, then this should be used.

bbb_uk wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2008 at 5:50pm:


Not in every case, especially if you can accept calls via VOIP.  I've got an 03 number (which I mostly just use for testing things) which is delivered to an asterisk box, and then onto our normal phones.  £1.18 a month, and no cost to receive calls.

The only disadvantage is lack of public awareness, but with the BBC now using them this should hopefully change.

Quite... there is very little you can't do with a VOIP system.  ...and if everything else fails, the 03 supplier I use (A&A) will deliver the call to a landline (or any block of phones of any sort, in various orders) albeit at standard call rates.

I use my asterisk box in quite a complicated situation, with three VOIP suppliers and a landline going through it, multiple extensions around the house, and a nice IVR that takes messages or forwards incoming calls out to mobiles if nobody is in.  And total cost to me so far, about a tenner each on two adapters for the actual phones. (Even the PC was free, off Freecycle.)