Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
SAYNOTO0870.COM

<---- Back to main website

 
Home Help Search Login Register

Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Ofcom's approach to consumer information (Read 4,855 times)
Dave
Global Moderator
*****
Offline



Posts: 9,902
Yorkshire
Gender: male
Ofcom's approach to consumer information
May 8th, 2006 at 7:45am
 
The following is from Ofcom's site:

Quote:
Ofcom's approach to consumer information

Ofcom does not consider it has a primary role in improving information flows between suppliers and consumers – this is best left to the market. However, we recognise that in some cases the market may not deliver to consumers the information they want. Where the evidence suggests that this has resulted in consumer harm, or is likely to do so in the future, there may be a case for regulatory intervention.

In these cases, Ofcom will first consider the scope for a self-regulatory or co-regulatory initiative, or for an initiative that would involve the provision of information by a third party. Only in exceptional cases will Ofcom itself provide information about suppliers or their products and services.

Full document here

I think that this says it all really. The recent Ofcom Consumer Policy review mentioned about Ofcom thinking that it's not responsible for providing information on services and pricing.

That's like letting supermarkets decide how they want to inform customers of the pricing of their products. Of course, it's not in their interest. It gives the perception of a regulator that is corrupt to the core.

The "evidence based" approach it mentions must be where it does something after the event. Premium rate scams and slamming, all things that should have been considered before they were put in to place.

How does Ofcom decide whether consumers are being harmed? Is it if they complain? So if they don't notice, it's alright then?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
bbb_uk
Global Moderator
*****
Offline



Posts: 2,041
Re: Ofcom's approach to consumer information
Reply #1 - May 8th, 2006 at 3:36pm
 
Ofcom's main priority seems to be to avoid any and all kind of regulation.

In a perfect world, teleco's would inform us of the cost of calls and not go out their way to avoid us knowing the cost as is the case now and in this perfect world us consumers don't get robbed so then regulation isn't needed.

But back to reality...  We're not in a perfect world but yet Ofcom's main policy is to avoid any regulation and therefore continue with us consumers being robbed/mislead, etc

What's the point in Ofcom having all those powers but decide not to use them in case they upset the teleco's?  Regardless to the fact that we are being robbed/mislead and yet Ofcom's statutory duties:-
Quote:
3 (1) It shall be the principal duty of Ofcom, in carrying out their functions;
(a) to further the interests of citizens in relation to communications matters; and
(b) to further the interests of consumers in relevant markets, where appropriate by promoting competition
seem to be ignored.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
gdh82
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 226
Re: Ofcom's approach to consumer information
Reply #2 - May 8th, 2006 at 5:23pm
 
Quote:
What's the point in Ofcom having all those powers but decide not to use them in case they upset the teleco's?  Regardless to the fact that we are being robbed/mislead and yet Ofcom's statutory duties:-

3 (1) It shall be the principal duty of Ofcom, in carrying out their functions;
(a) to further the interests of citizens in relation to communications matters; and
(b) to further the interests of consumers in relevant markets, where appropriate by promoting competition seem to be ignored.


I very much agree with you both, bbb_uk and Dave, and feel increasingly dispondent about Ofcom's inaction.  I could be completely wrong about this but looking more closely at the definition of their function maybe we are expecting too much of Ofcom !   It states that  their means of furthering the interests of consumers is
by promoting competition
.  The phrase 'by promoting competition' sounds pretty toothless to me, and maybe having an '03' range to compete with revenue sharing '08s' could illustrate this ?  Its certainly different to furthering the interests of consumers by applying fines and taking direct action against those that scam the general public.

Having said that,  I'm feeling even more depressed, and am very probably talking about matters I know  very little about !  Undecided   So treat this a desperate question from a despondent SayNo member !
Back to top
« Last Edit: May 8th, 2006 at 5:25pm by gdh82 »  

There's more of us that them, stick together and challenge 0870/0845 etc etc
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
(Moderators: Forum Admin, CJT-80, bbb_uk, DaveM, Dave)

Website and Content © 1999-2024 SAYNOTO0870.COM. All Rights Reserved.
Written permission is required to duplicate any of the content within this site.

WARNING: This is an open forum, posts are NOT endorsed by SAYNOTO0870.COM,
please exercise due caution when acting on any info from here.


SAYNOTO0870.COM » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved.


Valid RSS Valid XHTML Valid CSS Powered by Perl Source Forge