Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
SAYNOTO0870.COM

<---- Back to main website

 
Home Help Search Login Register

Pages: 1 2 3 ... 10
Send Topic Print
GP contract revised - "expensive" numbers banned (Read 172,409 times)
SilentCallsVictim
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


aka NHS.Patient, DH_fairtelecoms

Posts: 2,494
GP contract revised - "expensive" numbers banned
Apr 26th, 2010 at 8:10pm
 
I have started this new thread as, following the consultation and the petition, the campaign against GPs using revenue sharing numbers has entered a new phase (at least in England).

After doubt and delay, the Department of Health has now issued the contract revisions (for existing contractors) and the revised standard contract. This is covered on this page with links to the various documents.

Individual variation notices will be sent out by PCTs for acknowledgement by the GP.

Further briefings will be issued to the media and to every PCT referring to unofficial guidance on how to understand what numbers are subject to charges greater than that for "calls to a geographic number". These briefings will also confirm that long term contracts for the provision of telephone service allow migration from 084 to 034 numbers. Copies will be posted to my blogs.

There is nothing in what I am doing that should make any difference whatsoever to action that others may wish to take on a local basis with GPs, PCTs parliamentary candidates and local media. Likewise on a national level there is no formal campaign group that is briefing the media.

I will also be briefing the governments and media in Wales and Scotland. Those based there may wish to draw attention to the fact that on this issue relating to the principles of the NHS, it is England that is taking the lead.

This is also the time to remind NHS bodies using these "expensive" numbers that they only have until December to change their arrangements. Furthermore, any failure to announce their intention to change is likely to impede the process of getting GPs to do so.


P.S. If anyone wishes to use this thread to point out how easy it may be for GPs to avoid complying with the ban, or perhaps to encourage the media to put out stories indicating that GPs do not have to change, then that is their right. There is no question that the terms of the contract revisions could have been clearer or stronger. I believe however that they can be made to work and it is my intention to do all I can to see that they do.
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
idb
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1,499
Miami, Florida, United States
Gender: male
Re: GP contract revised - "expensive" numbers bann
Reply #1 - May 4th, 2010 at 1:25am
 
http://www.healthcarerepublic.com/news/1000619/GMS-contract-revision-bans-use-pr...

GMS contract revision bans use of premium rate numbers

Susie Sell, healthcarerepublic.com,
04 May 2010

<<
GPs using telephone numbers that cost more to call than a geographical number must change their arrangements, after the DoH revised the GMS contract.

The changes to the GMS contract, which came into effect on 1 April, makes clear that GP practices will no longer be able to use premium rate numbers.

Campaigner David Hickson said this would mean that the GPs who use 0844 numbers provided by Talk Talk will have to arrange migration to an alternative number, such as an 0344 number.

He said: ‘This is probably a better option for them than incurring the charges that would be levied if the contract for the telephone system that relies on this service were to be terminated early.'

A spokeswoman for the DoH said: ‘As announced in September 2009 the use of phone numbers that charge the public or patients a premium rate to contact the NHS were to be banned.

‘The department worked with the BMA's GP Committee to integrate the legislative changes into the GP contracts. This came into force on 1 April and the NHS will be reminded of this shortly.'
>>
Back to top
 

As from November 21, 2013, I no longer participate in the forum and am unable to receive private messages.
 
IP Logged
 
SilentCallsVictim
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


aka NHS.Patient, DH_fairtelecoms

Posts: 2,494
Re: GP contract revised - "expensive" numbers bann
Reply #2 - May 4th, 2010 at 2:53am
 
idb wrote on May 4th, 2010 at 1:25am:

I hope that fellow campaigners will join in the efforts to "remind" all NHS bodies and contractors of the fact that formal Directions and contract revisions are now in force.

The point about Talk Talk and 0344 is simply to clarify the fact that there is no need to wait until the end of any existing contract. A move away from a revenue sharing number is always possible.

(The full text of the quoted media release is published in the relevant blog.)
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
kasg
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 320
West Sussex
Gender: male
Re: GP contract revised - "expensive" numbers bann
Reply #3 - May 6th, 2010 at 3:12pm
 
idb wrote on May 4th, 2010 at 1:25am:
Shame about the two ignorant comments that have been posted on the article. Any healthcare professionals hear care to correct them?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
SilentCallsVictim
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


aka NHS.Patient, DH_fairtelecoms

Posts: 2,494
Re: GP contract revised - "expensive" numbers bann
Reply #4 - May 6th, 2010 at 3:52pm
 
kasg wrote on May 6th, 2010 at 3:12pm:
Shame about the two ignorant comments that have been posted on the article. Any healthcare professionals hear care to correct them?
We all have our areas of expertise. GPs cannot be expected to know that 03 numbers cost the same as ordinary numbers when called from mobiles and that migration from 084 to a 034 number is a quite normal practice within the term of a contract for supply of telephone service on a non-geographic number.

We have until next April for the message to be put across, taken on board and followed-up. It could have been quicker, but there are strong vested interests protecting their position.
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
sherbert
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 2,011
Gender: male
Re: GP contract revised - "expensive" numbers bann
Reply #5 - May 6th, 2010 at 4:08pm
 
SilentCallsVictim wrote on May 6th, 2010 at 3:52pm:
GPs cannot be expected to know that 03 numbers cost the same as ordinary numbers when called from mobiles



Why not?  Everyone else (well almost) knows so why not them? I bet they know this when using  their personal 'phones
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
SilentCallsVictim
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


aka NHS.Patient, DH_fairtelecoms

Posts: 2,494
Re: GP contract revised - "expensive" numbers bann
Reply #6 - May 6th, 2010 at 5:01pm
 
sherbert wrote on May 6th, 2010 at 4:08pm:
SilentCallsVictim wrote on May 6th, 2010 at 3:52pm:
GPs cannot be expected to know that 03 numbers cost the same as ordinary numbers when called from mobiles

Why not?  Everyone else (well almost) knows so why not them? I bet they know this when using  their personal 'phones

I personally think that this is an over-generous view of the extent of public understanding of telephone charges. Until quite recently the BBC was repeatedly declaring that 03 numbers cost more from mobiles, but not from landlines, in its standard message about its own 03 numbers. I understand that it was not bombarded with complaints about this misinformation.

We are also aware of organisations who deliberately promote misunderstanding about these difficult issues. I am reluctant to accept that nobody gets taken in by these efforts.

I strongly believe that there is much to be gained by simply informing people of the truth of the situation regarding 084 and 03 numbers. If all perpetrators and all victims of the misuse of revenue sharing numbers are fully aware of what is going on, then there is little that we can do to help to fully rectify the situation. I do not believe that this is the case; I hope that the information in the published article was helpful to some and I am inclined to accept that the question asked was a genuine expression of doubt.
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
sherbert
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 2,011
Gender: male
Re: GP contract revised - "expensive" numbers bann
Reply #7 - May 6th, 2010 at 5:45pm
 
SilentCallsVictim wrote on May 6th, 2010 at 5:01pm:
If all perpetrators and all victims of the misuse of revenue sharing numbers are fully aware of what is going on, then there is little that we can do to help to fully rectify the situation. I do not believe that this is the case;


I believe that the perpetrators are fully aware of what is going on.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
SilentCallsVictim
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


aka NHS.Patient, DH_fairtelecoms

Posts: 2,494
Re: GP contract revised - "expensive" numbers bann
Reply #8 - May 18th, 2010 at 6:21pm
 
It is now confirmed that the revised GP contracts, with a variation prohibiting use of "expensive" numbers, are now being issued to NHS GPs.

A briefing sent to PCTs and a media release have been published.


The new Minister of State (Health Services), replacing Mike O'Brien, is Simon Burns MP. His constituency includes a GP practice that adopted a 0844 number in October 2009.

Mr Burns has confirmed his support for a taxation funded NHS and has campaigned against excessive car parking charges (although not the 0844 telephone number) at the local hospital.
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
SilentCallsVictim
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


aka NHS.Patient, DH_fairtelecoms

Posts: 2,494
Re: GP contract revised - "expensive" numbers bann
Reply #9 - Jun 8th, 2010 at 10:44pm
 
Another interesting blog from elitetelecom  - Another Fuss About The NHS.

It would be interesting to know if anyone can trace the radio broadcast referred to.
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
SilentCallsVictim
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


aka NHS.Patient, DH_fairtelecoms

Posts: 2,494
Re: GP contract revised - "expensive" numbers bann
Reply #10 - Jun 27th, 2010 at 2:13am
 
An interesting article in the Leicester Mercury - Higher-rate calls to GPs set to stay - Friday, 25 June 2010.

I see that some apposite comments, including promotion for saynoto0870, have been added to the article.


I am happy to contribute to and promote discussion in this forum. I do however provide a series of feeds of all items I find (including the above) and my own commentaries on this topic and other topics on which I campaign.

These feeds are available for (free) subscription by rss or by email, at this link.

It would perhaps be better for members of the forum who are interested in this material to subscribe to the appropriate feed, so that they can bring items which they individually think worthy of comment into the discussion forum. I do not believe that it is for me to set the agenda for this forum.

N.B. I have no personal commercial interest in subscriptions to my feeds, nor in the viewing of my blogs or websites.
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Heinz
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1,362
Essex
Re: GP contract revised - "expensive" numbers bann
Reply #11 - Jun 27th, 2010 at 4:15pm
 
Unfortunately, the lack of understanding and/or research by the writer means nonsense like that highlighted below was published:

Quote:
Patients are still paying hefty phone charges to call GPs because doctors are tied in to expensive contracts.

Doctors said they were "not comfortable" about patients paying up to 40p a minute to ring 0844 numbers but that it was costly to buy out deals with phone companies.

At least 30 surgeries in Leicestershire use 0844 numbers.

BT now includes such numbers in its land line packages, which means some people are not now charged.

However, David Hickson's comments more than adequately covered that error.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jun 27th, 2010 at 4:19pm by Heinz »  

After years of ignoring govt. guidelines & RIPPING OFF Council Tax payers using 0845 numbers, Essex County Council changed to 0345 numbers on 2 November 2015
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Grump
Newbie
*
Offline



Posts: 2
Shipley, West Yorkshire
Gender: male
Re: GP contract revised - "expensive" numbers bann
Reply #12 - Jul 29th, 2010 at 9:46pm
 
29th July 2010

Bradford Primary Care Trust still deny any knowledge of receiving any documents later than December 2009/ January 2010 regarding the use of 0844. Therefore they are doing nothing to end the use of that type telephone number in the Bradford area. So much for the end of the use of 0844 by Gps.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
SilentCallsVictim
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


aka NHS.Patient, DH_fairtelecoms

Posts: 2,494
Re: GP contract revised - "expensive" numbers bann
Reply #13 - Jul 29th, 2010 at 11:17pm
 
Grump wrote on Jul 29th, 2010 at 9:46pm:
Bradford Primary Care Trust still deny any knowledge of receiving any documents later than December 2009/ January 2010 regarding the use of 0844. Therefore they are doing nothing to end the use of that type telephone number in the Bradford area. So much for the end of the use of 0844 by Gps.

Officers of Bradford PCT may be directed to this page of the Department of Health website -
http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolic....

I understand that the relevant issue of "The Week" (the weekly circular from the DH to PCTs) covered this item.
This cannot be verified because the document was not being published generally at that time, as it normally is, because a change of government was taking place.

Bradford PCT is in serious breach of its duties if it has not issued the relevant contract revisions to its GPs, using the standard form published at http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/@ps/document....

A copy of this briefing was sent to Simon Morritt - Chief Executive - Bradford and Airedale Teaching PCT<simon.morritt@bradford.nhs.uk>
at 12:46 on Monday 17 May 2010 - it was not returned as undeliverable.

I will be happy to help further with this and any other similar case. I am already dealing with a number of the 152 PCTs. I may be contacted using the links below.

The important point is to get the PCT to recognise that referring to false information issued by NEG and the BMA does not amount to a proper determination about the costs incurred by patients in calling 084 telephone numbers. The Department of Health DOES NOT endorse the NEG / BMA view.

The most effective approach (if possible) is to provide PCTs with copies of patients' telephone bills showing the cost of calls to the surgery alongside the cost (possibly zero) of equivalent calls to geographic numbers. The same can be achieved (although with more difficulty) by showing published tariff tables that relate to the telephone services used by patients.

It is a disgrace that the DH refuses to provide more complete guidance, as there is no difference in telephone charges between any one part of the country and another (except in Kingston upon Hull, where all "local" calls are generally free). It is ridiculous that every PCT, indeed every GP, has to go through exactly the same exercise - however that is what the previous government wanted, or perhaps was persuaded by the BMA to accept. The new government intends to make it much easier - we will not have to worry about having a National health service at all.
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
CJT-80
Global Moderator
*****
Offline



Posts: 1,713
Manchester
Gender: male
Re: GP contract revised - "expensive" numbers bann
Reply #14 - Sep 26th, 2010 at 3:40pm
 
Hello and sorry for resurecting this post,

I contacted my local MP regarding the use of 0844 Numbers in my area by local GP's including my own.  Here is my original e-mail:

"Dear Sir/Madam

I am e-mailing you in relation to a Local and in some ways National issue.  I obliviously understand you are only able to comment and deal with the local aspect of this issue.

The issue is as follows:

My local Dr's Surgery at Little Common at some point changed its contact number to an 0844 number, which I have to pay extra to call to.  To give you an idea of the cost I am with BT on an Unlimited Anytime Call plan, which offers me calls of up to 60 minutes to ANY 01/02/03 number anywhere in the UK for no additional cost.

However IF I call an 0844 number the cost is 5p per minute PLUS an initial cost of 9.9p (let's call that 10p), so my 1st minute costs me 15p and then 5p for every additional minute. Hopefully I haven't lost you so far.

My issue with this is very simple, I already pay for access to NHS services, including access to my local Dr, via my National Insurance Stamp. Why am I therefore expected to pay additional costs to call somewhere which is in the SAME dialling code?

This is NOT a business it's a service from the NHS!

Other local Dr’s Surgeries are using the same number, in fact out of nine local Dr’s only 3 use an 01424 number the remaining 6 use an 0844 number, the list is here: http://www.nhs.uk/Scorecard/Pages/Results.aspx?OrgType=1&Coords=1067%2c5716&Trea...

As you may or may not be aware this is becoming not only a local issue but one of National focus.  As a constituent in the area you cover, and a registered voter I am very very interested in your views on this, and what plans you have to voice my and others opinions to abolish the use of these numbers for access to NHS services.

Once again I appreciate you are only able to deal with local issues, but I hope you can take on board the general consensus and anger towards what is effectively your constituents being ripped off!

I look forward to your response and thank you for your time in reading this e-mail."

-------- response follows in next post ----------------
Back to top
 

Regards,

CJT-80

Any comments made are my own and are not those of SayNoTo0870.com
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 ... 10
Send Topic Print
(Moderators: Dave, DaveM, bbb_uk, Forum Admin, CJT-80)

Website and Content © 1999-2024 SAYNOTO0870.COM. All Rights Reserved.
Written permission is required to duplicate any of the content within this site.

WARNING: This is an open forum, posts are NOT endorsed by SAYNOTO0870.COM,
please exercise due caution when acting on any info from here.


SAYNOTO0870.COM » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved.


Valid RSS Valid XHTML Valid CSS Powered by Perl Source Forge