Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
NEW: MOBILE PHONE DEAL COMPARISONS
CHECK OUT OUR MOBILE PHONE DEAL COMPARISON SERVICE. GET THE BEST DEAL ON A NEW PHONE
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 3  Send Topic Send Topic Print Print
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) ANSWERPHONES (Read 62,284 times)
cavaliersteve
Newbie
*
Offline



Posts: 13
Location: Ladock, Cornwall
Joined: Oct 25th, 2005
Gender: Male
ANSWERPHONES
Oct 25th, 2005 at 4:37pm
Print Post Print Post  
SORRY BEING NEW TO THIS SITE & NOT BEING ABLE TO FIND AN APPROPRIATE FORUM I HAVE POSTED THIS HERE!

I am posting this to ask if anything can be done about answerphones, or, if anyone knows of a website I can visit! 
   
In my opinion (& a lot of my friends) there are times when one doesn't want to leave a message, but the outcome is that it cost about 5p not to leave a message.  
 
i.e. One phones up, an answerphone comes on to tell one, that basically the person being phoned has call waiting, but if they do not answer one gets another message to stating, leave a message or phone later.
 
This has now cost one approximately 5p for nothing (unless one wants to leave a message), how millions of 5p's are BT getting for this? 
   
In my opinion, in this day and age the message should be along the lines of,

   
The person you are calling cannot answer the phone right now, you have 2 choices, 
   
press 1 to leave a message for this you will be charged, or, press 2 to cancel the call, you will not be charged for this.


This is another "service" that I (& a lot of my friends) feel, should be looked into, or indeed have something done about it.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Dave
Global Moderator
*****
Offline



Posts: 9,902
Location: Yorkshire
Joined: Apr 29th, 2004
Gender: Male
Re: ANSWERPHONES
Reply #1 - Oct 25th, 2005 at 5:22pm
Print Post Print Post  
Quote:
In my opinion (& a lot of my friends) there are times when one doesn't want to leave a message, but the outcome is that it cost about 5p not to leave a message.

And that is the reason why services such as BT's 1571 and Orange Answerphone are 'free'; because the telcos have connected calls which otherwise wouldn't have connected and therefore would have used their network but not earned them anything.
 
Quote:
In my opinion, in this day and age the message should be along the lines of,
   
The person you are calling cannot answer the phone right now, you have 2 choices, 
   
press 1 to leave a message for this you will be charged, or, press 2 to cancel the call, you will not be charged for this.

I quite agree, but it's not in the telcos' interests. It's a case of this free market and competition which we are all told is so wonderful and makes companies provide us with what we want falls down!

These companies are busy spending their money on marketing these 'services', making people believe that they're giving them something!

Quote:
This is another "service" that I (& a lot of my friends) feel, should be looked into, or indeed have something done about it.

If you and your friends believe this, then why not opt to turn off mobile/landline voicemail.

What frustrates me is where I leave a message and the person tells me they don't bother getting messages are can't afford to (in the case of mobiles, ie not having enough credit.)

What's more, some of these mobile companies charge you to dial into your mailbox on their network!!! So they receive revenue from the caller who left the message and from you when you pick up the message and when you call the person back!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Heinz
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1,362
Location: Essex
Joined: Mar 4th, 2005
Re: ANSWERPHONES
Reply #2 - Oct 25th, 2005 at 6:25pm
Print Post Print Post  
Quote:
In my opinion (& a lot of my friends) there are times when one doesn't want to leave a message, but the outcome is that it cost about 5p not to leave a message. 

i.e. One phones up, an answerphone comes on to tell one, that basically the person being phoned has call waiting, but if they do not answer one gets another message to stating, leave a message or phone later.
 
This has now cost one approximately 5p for nothing (unless one wants to leave a message), how millions of 5p's are BT getting for this?

Best available (from a landline) is to make the call via 1899 or 18866.  Either would reduce the cost to 3p or a fraction more.
  

After years of ignoring govt. guidelines & RIPPING OFF Council Tax payers using 0845 numbers, Essex County Council changed to 0345 numbers on 2 November 2015
Back to top
IP Logged
 
cavaliersteve
Newbie
*
Offline



Posts: 13
Location: Ladock, Cornwall
Joined: Oct 25th, 2005
Gender: Male
Re: ANSWERPHONES
Reply #3 - Oct 26th, 2005 at 11:31am
Print Post Print Post  
The 1571 & Orange answerphone may be free but not to the person calling.

The other thing that is annoying is when one dials a number, and one hears the first beep of the engaged tone, and before the second or third beep starts, a message stating that the line is engaged comes on, to try and get one to use dial back or whatever it is, maybe because the person one is calling doesn't have an answerphone.
At present one doesn't get charged for this, but one wonders how long it will take for this to happen.

What is the point of having an engaged tone in the 1st place?

We all know what it was for originally, to let one know that the person we are calling are using their phone.

Thank you Dave & Heinz for answering to this posting!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Dave
Global Moderator
*****
Offline



Posts: 9,902
Location: Yorkshire
Joined: Apr 29th, 2004
Gender: Male
Re: ANSWERPHONES
Reply #4 - Oct 26th, 2005 at 11:52am
Print Post Print Post  
Engaged tone is free, so too are those messages you get from the mobile networks telling you that the person is unavailable (ie, where it doesn't go to answerphone).

This is presumably an industry wide rule where the call is not classed as connected (whereas an answering service is connected).

It appears that O2 have managed to get round this by providing a new 'service' called O2 Call Alert. This tells the caller that the receiver will be sent a text message giving them the number you called from. All well and good, you might think. But the call is now connected, and the caller charged (in most cases a minimum charge of 5p or so).

See this thread on MSE.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Shiggaddi
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 411
Location: Saltash, Cornwall
Joined: Aug 14th, 2004
Gender: Male
Re: ANSWERPHONES
Reply #5 - Oct 26th, 2005 at 2:41pm
Print Post Print Post  
Vodafone are actually quite good at allowing the caller to terminate the call if they do not wish to leave a message.

If you call a vodafone mobile, and if it rings, then goes to voicemail, then just before voicemail, you can notice the divert taking place because it makes 2 higher pitch ringing tone prior to voicemail kicking in.

And of course if the phone is switched off, the ringing is the higher pitched ringing, which is different to normal ringing.  Of course you only have about 1-2 secs to hang up, but I have called vodafones quite a few times from my other mobiles inclusive minutes, and the call counter doesn't start until the voicemail is answered, and if I hang up before, then the call is not logged.

All other mobile companies switch straight to voicemail without warning, but at least vodafone gives you a couple of seconds to hang up.
  

I realy hait itt wen peeple canot spel proply. Itt getts onn mye nervs sew mutch annd streses mee owt. Knot onley iz itt vary bade speling butt allso bade gramer.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
mc661
Senior Member
****
Offline


Habitual FOI requester.

Posts: 432
Location: West-Norfolk
Joined: May 26th, 2005
Gender: Male
Re: ANSWERPHONES
Reply #6 - Oct 26th, 2005 at 10:25pm
Print Post Print Post  
I had some automated BT woman call me up "promiting" 1571 with mobile connect.

Apparently (if im stupid and dont notice the hidden charges), I can have all my 1571 calls diverted to my mobile, or have the left message played to me on my mobile.
Yeah WOOOPIE. 

Then the small print comes. "all diverted calls will be charged at the BT rate for diverted calls to mobiles, you will be charged to listen to 1571 messages from your mobile, you will be charged.......... (at that point i slammed the phone down)".
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
jrawle
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 708
Location: Didcot, Oxfordshire
Joined: Jul 24th, 2004
Gender: Male
Re: ANSWERPHONES
Reply #7 - Oct 28th, 2005 at 9:01pm
Print Post Print Post  
I count the rings when calling a landline, and hang up before the 7th ring (which is where the answering service kicks in with BT). If I think the person might need longer to answer, I hit redial... hopefully they won't have just picked up the phone and dialled 1471 to see who it was.

What I really hate is when the line is engaged and the call goes straight to the answering service.

I refuse to have any voicemail service on my landline or mobile so as not to inflict it on others. I urge everyone to do the same.

I can't see the point of voicemail. If I wanted to leave a message, I'd have used e-mail, which is free! If I call someone, it's because I actually want a two-way conversation!
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
lavillegour
Newbie
*
Offline


We'll All Be Dead in 100
Years !

Posts: 25
Joined: Jan 24th, 2005
Re: ANSWERPHONES
Reply #8 - Oct 28th, 2005 at 10:28pm
Print Post Print Post  
I also had an 'automated B.T. woman' place a message on my phone after it wasn't answered at 7.30 a.m. After discovering that the message was left by a mobile number (0798 ******) I rang B.T. and finally got thru to their customer  'service' who apparently knew nothing about why a mobile number was used , why B.T. market a service like this & didn't abide by the Telephone Preference Service Rules (appeared to think that they didn't have to unless the customer specifically asked for this to be entered in their B.T. files).
Any body got a clue why B.T. would use a mobile number ?

No folks I don't intend spending the 15 pence necessary to ring the number !
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
cavaliersteve
Newbie
*
Offline



Posts: 13
Location: Ladock, Cornwall
Joined: Oct 25th, 2005
Gender: Male
ANSWERPHONES -Ofcom's Reply
Reply #9 - Nov 1st, 2005 at 11:29am
Print Post Print Post  
Our Ref: 2553185 



31 Oct 2005 

Dear Mr Hicks. 

Thank you for your email to Ofcom. 

The usefulness of answer phones and whether an individual objects to being charged does, of course, depend very much on the individual's point of view.  If the caller wants to leave a message then clearly they consider it to be a benefit.  If they do not then they will take the opposite view. 

We have recorded the views you make about what answer phone messages should now say.   

Yours sincerely 





Steven Parker 
Ofcom Contact Centre 



Ofcom are continually aiming to improve customer service levels, as such your details may be passed to a research agency who will be conducting some research for us. If you would prefer not to be contacted for research purposes you can telephone Ofcom on 0800 169 7670. Please note this is a voicemail service only and we will not be able to discuss your complaint or query on this number. Alternatively you can e-mail your Ofcom reference and full name with the message No contact to market.research@ofcom.org.uk



::Steven Parker 
Telecoms Support 
contact@ofcom.org.uk 

:Shockedfcom 
Riverside House 
2a Southwark Bridge Road 
London SE1 9HA 
020 7981 3040 
www.ofcom.org.uk ;

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
cavaliersteve
Newbie
*
Offline



Posts: 13
Location: Ladock, Cornwall
Joined: Oct 25th, 2005
Gender: Male
Re: ANSWERPHONES
Reply #10 - Nov 11th, 2008 at 1:46pm
Print Post Print Post  
Quote:
Dave wrote: It appears that O2 have managed to get round this by providing a new 'service' called O2 Call Alert. This tells the caller that the receiver will be sent a text message giving them the number you called from. All well and good, you might think. But the call is now connected, and the caller charged (in most cases a minimum charge of 5p or so).


This I am getting fed up with as well, if I try to ring my wife on her mobile and she is in an area that has bad reception, o2 send a text to tell her I tried to call, but we may be in town just trying to locate one another so another 10p I believe for the text.

This happens with friends as well, my point being, that if my call is important I am quite capable of sending a text, whereas o2 have no idea if the call is important and send the text anyway.

Does anyone know if I can "opt out" of this service?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Dave
Global Moderator
*****
Offline



Posts: 9,902
Location: Yorkshire
Joined: Apr 29th, 2004
Gender: Male
Re: ANSWERPHONES
Reply #11 - Nov 11th, 2008 at 2:16pm
Print Post Print Post  
cavaliersteve wrote on Nov 11th, 2008 at 1:46pm:
This happens with friends as well, my point being, that if my call is important I am quite capable of sending a text, whereas o2 have no idea if the call is important and send the text anyway.

Does anyone know if I can "opt out" of this service?

Information from O2 on CallAlert is here.

You and your wife can disable this service by dialling 1760. You might like to advise your friends to do the same.

If you withhold your number to someone who has this service on, you will not be charged. I assume that because you haven't given your number it can't and won't send them a text.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
derrick
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1,124
Joined: Mar 23rd, 2005
Re: ANSWERPHONES
Reply #12 - Nov 11th, 2008 at 2:18pm
Print Post Print Post  
cavaliersteve wrote on Nov 11th, 2008 at 1:46pm:
Quote:
Dave wrote: It appears that O2 have managed to get round this by providing a new 'service' called O2 Call Alert. This tells the caller that the receiver will be sent a text message giving them the number you called from. All well and good, you might think. But the call is now connected, and the caller charged (in most cases a minimum charge of 5p or so).


This I am getting fed up with as well, if I try to ring my wife on her mobile and she is in an area that has bad reception, o2 send a text to tell her I tried to call, but we may be in town just trying to locate one another so another 10p I believe for the text.

This happens with friends as well, my point being, that if my call is important I am quite capable of sending a text, whereas o2 have no idea if the call is important and send the text anyway.

Does anyone know if I can "opt out" of this service?



Blimey, 3 years to reply, this must surely be a record!!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
jrawle
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 708
Location: Didcot, Oxfordshire
Joined: Jul 24th, 2004
Gender: Male
Re: ANSWERPHONES
Reply #13 - Nov 11th, 2008 at 10:48pm
Print Post Print Post  
derrick wrote on Nov 11th, 2008 at 2:18pm:
Blimey, 3 years to reply, this must surely be a record!!

It can actually be slightly annoying when people drag up really old threads. There comes a stage when it's better to start a new thread on the same topic.

The worst is, I was looking through earlier messages in the threads and saw someone who seemed to have similar views to me when it comes to BT 1571. Then I realised that message was posted, in 2005, by a user called jrawle!
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
NGMsGhost
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


The Forum Ghost of NonGeographicalMan<b
r />

Posts: 2,720
Location: Surrey, United Kingdom
Joined: Oct 24th, 2006
Gender: Male
Re: ANSWERPHONES
Reply #14 - Nov 15th, 2008 at 2:03pm
Print Post Print Post  
I have the equivalent service called Vodafone CallCatcher on my mobile and it sends a text when someone calls me and my phone is turned off or I am out of network coverage - it gives the CLI of the number that called and the time and date.  So far as I am aware the caller is not charged for this service as they just get the usual free network announcement that the phone is off or not available at present.
« Last Edit: Nov 15th, 2008 at 2:03pm by NGMsGhost »  

<div style=
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 3 
Send Topic Send Topic Print Print